.IX.et dimenſiones corporis chriſti triplex comparatio ſumipoterat. Primo quia dimenſiones hoſtie ſic comparanturad dimenſiones corporis chriſti ꝙ ſimul cum dimenſioni-bus hoſtie poſſunt eſſe dimenſiones corporis Secūdo qꝛdimenſiones vnius ꝑtis corporis chriſti ſic etiam cōꝑant̉ad dimenſiones alterius ꝑtis ꝙ illis non reſiſtūt ſꝫ ſimul cūeis eſſe valent Sꝫ ẜm ꝯꝑationem t̓tiā ẜm quā dimenſio-nes vniꝰ ꝑtis hoſtie ad dimenſiones alterius ꝑtis comꝑā-tur eſt ibi completa reſiſtentia et iſte cum illis eſſe non poſ-ſūt. quantitas gͦ hoſtie erit tota ī tota hoſtia et pars ī parteeo ꝙ vbi vna ꝑs hoſtie exiſtit altera eſſe non pōt ideo plusoccupat de loco tota hoſtia qͣꝫ ꝑs eius ſꝫ vt patet ꝑ habi-ta vbi eſt aliqua pars hoſtie ibi eſt aliqua pars corporischr̄i qꝛ quantitas hoſtie non reſiſtit quantitati corporisRurſum vbi ē vna pars corporis chriſti ibi pōt eſſe alia etetiā ꝑ ꝯſequēs ibi poterit eſſe totū corpus quia dimenſio-nes vnius ꝑtis corꝑis dimenſionibus alterius partis nonreſiſtunt. ergo vbi eſt quecunqꝫ pars hoſtie non ē inconue-niens ꝙ ibi ſit totum corpus chr̄i Eſt ergo via tertia declarata. ex his autem tribus vijs declaratur plene veritas Naꝑ primam viam habetur totam ſubſtantiam corporis chr̄ieſſe in tota hoſtia et totam in qualibet ꝑte ſicut ſubſtātiali-ter tota ſubſtātia panis conuerſa in totam ſubanſtiam cor-poris chr̄i erat ſubſtātialiter tota in tota hoſtia et tota in qͣ-libet ꝑte. Per ſcd̓am aūt viam ꝑ quam oenditſtur totalita-tem quātitatiuam corporis chr̄i: trahi ad modum totalita-tis ſubſtantie manifeſte colligitur ꝙ ſicut corpus chr̄i ſicutſubſtantialiter e ſttotum in tota hoſtia et totum in qualiberparte ſic etiā ẜm totā quātitatem ſuam eſſe totum ſub totahoſtia totum ſub qualibet parte. Per tertiam autem viamomnes ambiguitates tolluntur. Non enim debet eſſe ambiguuꝫ vtrū tota quātitas corporis chriſti poſſit eſſe in qua-libet parte hoſtie. Nam ſi vna pars corporis chr̄i alteri ꝑ-ti reſiſteret et vbi vna pars eſſet: altera eē non poſſet plus