BIBLIOGRAPHY.

270. Goebel, F. and Kunze, G.

Pharmaceutische waarenkunde. 2 v. Eisenach, 1827-34.

271. Gomez, B. A.

Memoria sobre Ipecacuanha fusca do Brasil. Lisboa, 1801.

272. Gomez, B. A.

Memoria sobre a virtude taenifuga de romaira. Lisboa, 1822.

273. Good, Peter P.

Family flora and materia medica botanica. Elizabethtown, 1845-7.

274. Gorter, Joh. de.

Materies medica compendio medicinae accomodata. Harderovici, 1733.

275. Gough, J. P.

Essay on cantharides. Philadelphia, 1800.

276. Graham, John.

A catalogue of plants growing in Bombay and its vicinity. Bombay, 1839.

277. Grand'clement, J. M.

De l'ergot de ble. Paris, 1855.

278. Granville, A. B.

The sumbul; a new Asiatic reniedy. London, 1850.

279. GraumüMer, J. C. F.

Flora pharmaceutica Jenensis. Jenas, 1815.

280. Graves, George.

Hortus medicns. London, 1833.

281. Gray, S. F.

Supplement to the pharmacoposias. London, 1.818. (Later edition.)

282. Griffith, R. E.

Medical botany. Phila.. 1847.

283. Groenevelt, J. (w Greenfield.)

De tuto cantharidum in medieina usu interno. Londini, 1698.

284. Gronovius, J. F.

Diss. camphoras historiam exhibens. Lugduni Batavorum, 1715.

285. Grosourdy, Rene de.

El medico botänico criollo. 4 v. Paris, 1864.

286. Guibourt, N. J. B. G.

Histoire abregee des drogues simples. Paris, 1820. (Later editions.)Histoire naturelle des drogues simples. Paris, 1822. (Later editions.)Memoire sur les sucs astringents connus sous les noms de cachou,gambir, et kino. Paris, n. d.

287. Guillemot, A.

Sur les proprietes lJhysiologiques et therapeutiques de 1'arnica. Paris,1874.

288. Gunn, J. C.

Domestic medicine. Phila., 1839. (Later editions.)

289. Hagendorn, E.

Tractatus physico-medicus, de catechu, sive terra japonica. Jen», 1879.

290. Hager, Hermann.

Commentar zur pharmacoposa borussica. Lissa, 1865.

Commentar zur pharmacopcea germanica. Berlin, 1873-4. (1883-4.)

Handbuch der pharmaceutischen praxis. Berlin, 1876-8. (Later editions.)

in