BIBLIOGRAPHY.

108. Brunton, T. L.

On digitalis, with some observations on the urine. London, 1868.Pharmacology and therapeutics. London, 1880. (Later editions, English,French, and Italian.)

109. Bryarly, W.

Essay on the Lupulus communis of Gaertner; or the common hop.Phila., 1805.

110. Buchan, William.

Domestic medicine, London, 1772. (Many English, American, French,Spanish, and Italian editions.)

111. Buchanan, Francis.

Account of an Indian remedy for the tapeworm. (Edinburgh Med. andSurg. Journ., 1807, pp. 22-24.) (Punica.)

112. Burnes, Alexander.

Travels into Bokhara. 2 v. London, 1834.

113. Burton, R. F.

First foot-prints in East Africa. London, 1856.

Lake regions of central Africa. 2 v. London, 1860. (Strophanthus, i,pp. 247, 297; ii, p. 338.)

114. Buc'hoz, J. P.

Collection des plantes medicales de la Chine. Paris, 1781.Dissertations sur l'utilite, et les bons et mauvais effets du tabac, du cafe,

du cacao et du the. 2 ed. Paris, 1788.Manuel medical des plantes. 2 v. Paris, 1770.

115. Buchwald, Johannes de.

Specimen medico-practico-botanicum. Havnise, 1720.

116. Bulletins of the Lloyd Library. Cincinnati, 1900-

117. Burger, J.

Ueber colchicin. Würzburg, 1859.

118. Burwell, L.

Observations on the Digitalis purpurea. Phila., 1805.

119. Cabanes, Augustin.

De l'emploi des preparations d'Hydrastis canadensis en medicine. Paris,1889.

120. Camerarius, Joachim.

Opuscula qusedam de re rustica. Noribergas, 1577. (2 ed. 1596.)Symbolorum et emblematum ex re herbaria desumtorum centuria.Noribergse, 1590. (Later editions.)

121. Candolle, A. de.

L'origine des plantes cultivees. Paris, 1883. (Later editions in English,Italian, and German.)

122. Candolle, A. P. de.

Description d'un nouveau genre de plantes, Strophanthus, de la famille

des Apocinees. (Ann. Mus. d'Nat. Hist., Paris, i, 1802 (1801), pp.

408-12, 1 pl.)Essai sur les proprietes medicales des plantes. Paris, 1804. (Later

editions, French and German.)Recherches botanico-medicales sur les diverses espöces d'ipecacuanha.

(Bull. Fac. de Med. de Paris, i, 1804, pp. 92-95.)

IOI