licet aūt huiꝰmōi ſc̓pture ꝓ magna ꝑte ſint falſe ſcilicet thalmud.et gloſe doctorū hebraicorū: tn̄ ꝑeas poſſumus cot a eos argue̓ efficaciter exquo ſunt ab eis dictomodo recepte: ſicut ecōtrario ſi argumēta facerent ꝯtra nos ex euāgelio et ſcripturis apoſtolorū et huiuſmōi eſſent efficacia ꝯtra nos. licet reputēt huiꝰ mōi ſcripturas falſū ꝯtinere Uiſo pͥmo que ſcripture ſint a iudeis recepte: ſecūdo vidēdū eſt an illd̓ qd̓ in queſtioē ponitur poſſit ad illas efficaciter ꝓhari. Et diſtinguo de ꝓbatione efficaci; ꝙ efficatia ꝓbationis poteſtacuipi vno modo ꝙ ſit tam efficaxꝓhatio ꝙ nō poſſit euitari ſine euidēte negatione vel cōtradictioēſcripture predicte: et ſic videturmichi ꝙ nō ſit adhuc ꝓbatū ꝑ predictā ſcripturā qd̓ in queſtione q̄ritur. cuiꝰ rō eſt qͥa miſteriū trinitatis et incarnatioīs xp̄i expreſſiꝰponitur in ſcriptura noui teſtamēti ꝙ veteris ſicut patꝫ manifeſte ⁊ab oībus ꝯceditur: et tamē heretici multi totū nouū teſtamētū recipiūt et ꝓ ſuis erroribꝰ exponūt.aliqui tamē eorū negant trinitatē.ꝑſonarū in diuinis ſicut ſabelliꝰ.et aliqui negant diuinitatē ī xpōſicut arrius. ⁊ aliqͣ verā huānitatēſicut manicheus. qͥ dixit ipm̄ habere carnē fantāſticā ad quod ſeqͥturip̄m nō eē verū hominē. qͥa caro vera ē de veritate humane nature Similiter arrius qui dicit ipm̄ n̄ habere animā intellectiuā. ⁊ ad dictūvtriuſqꝫ ſeqͥtur xp̄m̄ non eſſe hominē. cū ab dnima intellectiua accipiatur ſpecies humanā Si igit̉predidi heretici exponant ꝓ ſe ſc̄pturā noui teſtamēti. multo magisiudei poſſūt ꝓ ſe exponere ſcripturā veteris teſtamēti Alio modo poteſt accipi efficacia ꝓbationis perſcripturā ſic ꝙ licet ſcriptuā̓ poſſetexponi alio modo ſaltē ad eucidēdūabſqꝫ ꝯtradictione manifeſta. tamē ſimplicit̓ loquēdo non p̄t exponi rōnebiliter ſic. qͥn ſemꝑ apporeat expoſitio fidei catholite rōnabilior: ⁊ hoc modo credo illud qd̓ poſitū eſt in qͣſtione ꝓbatū eē a ſanctis ꝑ ſcriptura veteris teſtamēti.et iterū hoc idē ꝓbari poteſt hocmō ¶ In queſtione aūt duo ponūt̉Prmū qd̓ ꝑtinet ad tꝑs Vtrūtꝑ̄s aduentꝰ xp̄ī ſit pret̓itū; ſcd̓mquod ꝑtinet ad ꝑſona vt ſit deuset homo in vna ꝑſona. ⁊ illud implicat duo: qͥa fides catholica ponit vnionem diuine nature et humane in determinata perſona ſcilicet in ꝑſona filij. et nō patris necſpiritus ſancti. et ex hoc ſupponit̉pluralitas ꝑſonarū in diuinis qd̓fortiſſime negatur a iudeis Sicigitur ad ꝓbandū qd̓ in queſtioēponit̉ ſcilicꝫ vtrū ꝑ ſcripturā a iudeis recepta ⁊cͣ tria ſūt ꝑ ordinemdeclarāda ex eadē ſcriptura. Priꝰeſt ꝙ in vnitate eſſencie diuine. eſt