0

o

S ct

A l

’E 7T

l5

<?

a. i.[’Ae%>f] J-sfoa? Jjjtrau “X^t^ov (JouAo?,

uSehipos Je <«Ka!,Sou, roT? gv ,9-gcy tuxt^)yyiaapevois, ygjj tyacv TiTr^n^evcts

2 . zhYirois' sKsos vy.7v ycfj hgqvii xcfj uya.7ir\Tfhn^VvbeiYl.

A. 7TgOCC%i J? T*J5 STlVe#?» TJJlt

t»v i&trefieijy x.cq atrtXyojv uv^ga/v' h w,?Ff£< j? xflAflC<rg6/$, xaS 1 oLCoi&xrt? r*/y

KAXaj ufAQt^TuXm ts xccj

dycc7SYi m

I- A. r»; y. tjj? Tvgivr t $ xscf ttvvfco &• Tot* ccytov aTfl-ToAot* tov&ce,*; tytrov*

i« ti)ir 6 v xfyZtv] X^tTov tycov. O. Qrig. hanc epilto»lam et eius initium laudat III, 4 ^ 5 * Item 607.Pe ea, ut dubia, loquitur 814* Ergo dubitatum.

*iyntruiyoif ] uyxirtuivo^» E. Orig. III, 607.Oecum, in textu et in felioI, II, 621. TbeophyI,446. in fcholio folum. Sed iita explicatio, nec invetutta catena, nec in Molqq. Codd, fcholiis le-gitur.

TSrttg^uii/oif ] Orig. IU, 607. explicat? ttxvtais*(Une ullo dubio :) t*jro ra/v rn^olnm xyyiXm*