292
INDEX TO
Mary as King and QueenV. 14. Ascendency of the“Club,” V.. 14. The Act ofIncapacitation carried, V. 16.Conflict between the Con-vention and the Lord HighCommissioner Hamilton,V. 16. The Parliament ad-journed, Y. 31.
Convocation: address of Par-liament to William III. tosummon, IV. 113. Appoint-ed to meet. V. 135., V. 142.The clergy ill affected to-wards King William, V. 143.Constitution of the Convo-cation , V. 148. The Convo-cations of Canterbury andYork, V. 149. The twoHouses, V. 150. Electionof members, V. 151. TheConvocation meets, V. 154.Beveridge’s Latin sermon,V. 154. The High Churchparty amaiority in theLowerHouse, V. 155. The King’swarrant and message, Y. 157.Difference between the twoHouses, V. 157. Presents anaddress to the King, V. 157.The Lower House provesunmanageable, V. 158. Pro-rogued, Y. 159.
Cork; its present state com-pared with its condition atthe time of the Revolution,IV. 170. Visit of James II.to, IV. 171.
Cornish, Henry; his attainderreversed, V. 48.
Coronation of William and
Mary, IV. 118. The coro-nation modal, IV. 119.
Coronation Oath; discussionon the bill for settling,IV. 115. Revisal of the, bythe Convention of Scotland,
IV. 290.
Corporation Act; hill for re-pealing the, IV. 109. Thedebate adjourned and notrevived, IV. 110.
Corporation Bill; introducedinto the Commons, V. 181.Sacheverell’s clause, V. 182.SirltobertHoward’s motion,
V. 182. Tumultuous debateon the bill, V. 186. Theodious clauses lost, V. 187.
Corruption, parliamentary;rise and progress of, in Eng-land, V. 206.
Corryarrick, IV. 323., 327.
Cosmas Atticus; deprivationof, referred to, IV. 102.
Cotton, Sir Robert; his opinionon the Coronation OathBill,IV. 117. note.
Council, Privy; the first, ofWilliam III. sworn in, IV. 15.
Covenanters; disgust of rigid,at the reverence paid to theholidays of the Church,IV. 248. The Church clergy-men “rabbled” by the Co-venanters, IV. 249. Fearsof the elder Covenantorsrespecting the proceedingsof their riotous brethren,IV. 250. Their outrages inGlasgow, IV. 251. Their in-flexible pertinacity' of prin-ciple, IV. 272. They threaten