The PREFACE.

V

the (âme, as if it had been lâid (according to the StriClneß of the Sta-tutes) that the Lord JPylloughbys Stall was then void, and the Editor ra-ther took that cautious Manner of Exprelfion, which terminates in thefame Conci ufion with the other, Enee this Sir Edward had been men-tioned to be eleCled in the preceeding Year. However this Entry in theRegißr. Chart, is fbme Proof of what hath been oblerved of the Occafionof the O million of the Name of this Sir Edward Hull out of the Windfor-Tables, mentioned in the Introd. p. 2,1.

3 4 H. 6. p. 156". The Black-Book faith ad Regem Arrogonum, the Reg.Chart. £ 3 zb. au Roy de Portugale, whereof the Editor had given his Opi-nion in Introd. p. 1 8 1, 1 8 z. and in the note to this Book p. 5 3. n. 2.

35 H. 6. p. 161. Eßalle ‘voyde par mort de l'Empereur Sigilmond is addedin Reg. Chart, f. 33, The Editor omitted to call up the Number of theStalls in that Year, which with this Vacancy would compleat the Society.

3 6 H. 6. p. i 61. MeJJire Johan. Faftolf excufez pour fa 'veillejfe is addedReg. Chart, f. 3 4, and the Editor in note p. had oblerved, that he wasomitted together with another Companion.

5 E, 4. p. 1 79, inftead of Dudley the Regißr. Chart, f. 5 p b. had Sude-ley , which the Editor had conjectured in the note k. in that folio.

6 E. 4. p. i 8 r, among the Ablênts Monfieur de Skalez is added Reg.Chart, f. 40 b. When the Editor considered the Entries of this Year, heoblerved in note r. that the Duke of Milan was not mentioned, and inp. i 8 3 note t. that this Duke died on 8 March in this Year, and thatthis Lord Scales fucceeded in this Vacancy, and farther took Notice, thatthe Chapter wherein this Lord was elected had been omitted. This Lordis firll named in this Black-Book on zxd Apr. 7 E. 4. fo that the Guelfeof the Editor Was right in the Subitanee of this Matter, but it was im-polfible for him to have then determined, w hether this Lord had been actu-ally eleCted on or before this 17 Apr. 6 E. 4.

1 4 E. 4. p. i 85) le Duc de Burgoine is added in Reg. Chart, f. 43, andwhereas the Black-Book had Dominus Audley, this French Regilter hathle Sire de Duddeley. The Editor was fo fortunate as to hit upon boththefe Amendments in p. 1 8 8 note m 3 and p. 185? note n.

i y E. 4. p. 1 9 1, Le Duc de Burgoine is added in the Reg. Chart.

Hitherto this Collector had been luccelsful in adventuring his Talentsin guelling, but here he mull own his Want of Diligence, either throughHaile or Inadvertency 3 upon the leali RecolIeCtion it might have occur-red to his Memory, that this Duke of Burgundy was then a Companion,Enee he had Ipecified the OmilEon of him in the precedent Year p. 1 8 8note m, and had made the lame Remark in the Year fublequcnt to thisvery Entry p. 1^7, and referred to the Time of his Death in p. 15?8.He thought this his Eee ConfelEon much more candid, than the cheapArtifice of reprinting an half Sheet, and offers it as an Earned of hisFacility in formally retraCling any Millakes he hath unwarily committed.

The Occafion of this Overfight was by milcomputing the Number ofthe Knights, who are mifreckoned to be xxiii prelent, when in FaCl therewere only xxi, the Names of lome of them being repeated in that En-try, fo that p. i i notez, fliould be read thus, Twenty one Knights here

b nomi-

i